Cutting-edge research and public service are at the heart of the Evans School of Public Affairs. Our faculty members, students, and partners work together to tackle important challenges in:
Our research projects contribute substantially to innovative policy and management solutions, civic engagement, and academic collaboration in communities worldwide. Find out more about our:
You can also tap into the Evans School faculty areas of expertise in public policy and management.
Our research and outreach centers at the Evans School of Public Affairs provide innovative analysis and solutions for many different issues locally, nationally, and internationally. Our centers include:
Other research and outreach projects at the Evans School include:
The core aim of the Benefit-Cost Analysis Center is to improve the understanding and use of benefit-cost analysis (or BCA) as a decision-making tool.
Our research and outreach is geared toward:
This involves working with a variety of government agencies and academic professionals whose work involves benefit-cost analysis (BCA). We accomplish this through:
Advancing Social Policy-Making Through Benefit-Cost Analysis: June 24-25, 2008
First Annual Meeting for the Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis: June 25-26, 2008
Find out more about benefit-cost analysis (BCA) and our conferences and papers.
Support for the Benefit-Cost Analysis Center is provided by the Evans School of Public Affairs and the MacArthur Foundation.
Join our mailing list to receive updates on our news and events.
Benefit-cost (or cost-benefit) analysis (or BCA) aims to inform the decision-making process with specific types of information, namely measures in monetary terms of willingness to pay for a change by those who will benefit from it, and the willingness to accept the change by those who will lose from it.
The use of monetary terms provides a common metric. Its purpose is not to price everything, but rather to order choices in a way that is informative about social choices for decision makers.
Find about more about the Benefit-Cost Analysis Center and the Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis.
The Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis is an international organization dedicated to the advancement, encouragement, and exchange of ideas, research, and other activities related to cost-benefit analysis (BCA), cost-effectiveness analysis, risk-benefit analysis, applied welfare economic analysis, and damage assessments.
First Annual Meeting: June 25-26, 2008 Find out more >>
Find out more about the Benefit-Cost Analysis Center and our conferences and papers.
The central purpose of the Benefit-Cost Analysis Center is to disseminate information to those working in government agencies and academic institutions who use benefit-cost analysis (BCA) methodology.
Our conferences play an important role in this, and help us in reaching our goal to start a national conversation on standards to follow in applying benefit-cost analysis (BCA) as a decision-making tool.
Advancing Social Policy-Making Through Benefit-Cost Analysis: June 24-25, 2008
First Annual Meeting for the Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis: June 25-26, 2008
To receive information about future Benefit-Cost Analysis Center events, register your contact information with us today.
The Relevance of the Scitovsky Reversal Paradox for Cost-Benefit Analysis (562 KB PDF) by Andrew Schmitz of the University of Florida and Richard O. Zerbe of the Evans School of Public Affairs at the University of Washington
2007 Conference Papers & Presentations
To submit a paper for inclusion on our website, please our paper submission form.
June 24-25, Washington, D.C.
This national policy forum is funded by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and will:
We will also aim to develop strategies for making Benefit Cost Analysis more practical, consistent, and implementable, within the social policy fields.
We have invited leading scholars, practitioners, lawyers, and policy-makers to share ideas about the implementation of benefit-cost analysis techniques and procedures. We also hope conference participants will offer advice on how improve the quality of social benefit-cost analysis and increase the usage of it in regard to social programs at all levels of government.
Register today >>
(Registration for this conference requires a registration code. If you have not received your registration code, please contact evansors@u.washington.edu.)
Day 1: Tuesday, June 24 – 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
The conference will present the following panels, highlighting recent successes of integration between benefit-cost analysis and social policy-making with and emphasis on identifying transferable lessons.
Day 2: Wednesday, June 25 – 8:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.
The second day of the conference will focus on identifying research strategies that will make Benefit-Cost Analysis more practical and useable in future social policy-making.
Find out more about the Benefit-Cost Analysis Center and Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis.
When: June 25-26, 2008
*This meeting will follow the Advancing Social Policy-Making Through Benefit-Cost Analysis conference on June 24-25.
Where: The Liaison Capitol Hill, An Affinia Hotel, 415 New Jersey Avenue NW, Washington, D.C.
Rooms will be held until May 30 for a special meeting rate of $289 plus tax. Parking will be available for $34/day. Reserve your hotel and parking reservations at 202.638.1616.
Conference and membership registration fees:
Day 1: Wednesday, June 25
Day 2: Thursday, June 26
Find out more about the Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis and the Benefit-Cost Analysis Center.
Papers and presentations from our 2007 Benefit-Cost Analysis Conference held May 18-19.
Transportation Benefit-Cost Analysis: It's All About Inputs!
Paper (556 KB PDF) / Presentation (470 KB PDF)
By Chris Williges and Mahmoud Mahdavi
Presented by Chris Williges
A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Private Versus Semi-Private Inpatient Rooms in a New Hospital
Paper (129 KB PDF) / Presentation (336 KB PDF)
By Anthony Boardman and Diane Forbes
Presented by Anthony Boardman
Using the Kaldor-Hicks Tableau Format for Cost-Benefit Analysis and Stakeholder Evaluation
Paper (171 KB PDF) / Presentation (96 KB PDF)
By Kerry Krutilla
Presented by Kerry Krutilla
An Ethical Benefit-Cost Analysis
By Richard Zerbe Jr.
Presented by Richard Zerbe Jr.
Suggested New Steps Toward the Practical Implementation of Cost-Benefit Analysis
Paper (83 KB PDF)
By Arnold Harberger
Presented by Arnold Harberger
Galactosemia: Testing Newborn Infants for Metabolic Disorders
Paper (485 KB PDF) / Presentation (189 KB PDF)
By Cathy Carruthers, Ron Scott, Mike Glass, John Thompson
Presented by Cathy Carruthers
Production Response to Increased Imports
Presentation (307 KB PDF)
By Lynn Kennedy and Andrew Schmitz
Presented by Andrew Schmitz
The "Stern Review" and Its Critics: Implications for the Theory and Practice of Benefit-Cost Analysis
Paper (197 KB PDF) / Presentation (730 KB PDF)
By Daniel Cole
Presented by Daniel Cole
The Welfare Economics of Sharing Fixed Costs of Product Safety Regulation
Presentation (1,007 KB PDF)
By Richard Just
Presented by Richard Just
The Information Industry, Distant Use Value and the Exxon Valdez
Presentation (235 KB PDF)
By R. Scott Farrow and Douglas M. Larson
Presented by Scott Farrow
Cost-Effective Species Conservation
Presentation (768 KB PDF)
By Mark Plummer
Presented by Mark Plummer
To Trade or Not to Trade: The Endowment Effect and Manipulations of the Reference State
Paper (72 KB PDF)
By Jack Knetsch and Wei-Kang Wong
Presented by Jack Knetsch
Find out more about the Benefit-Cost Analysis Center.
The Benefit-Cost Analysis Center is led by Richard O. Zerbe with assistance from:
Richard O. Zerbe
Benefit-Cost Analysis Center
Evans School of Public Affairs
University of Washington
Box 353055
Room 226 Parrington Hall
Seattle, WA 98195-3055, USA
Phone: 206-616-5470
Email: zerbe@u.washington.edu
Join our mailing list to receive updates on our news and events.
The nonpartisan Civic Engagement for the 21st Century Project at the Evans School is dedicated to forming a new model for solving complex community challenges by renewing and transforming civic engagement into a process that:
The project goes beyond theory to actually convene people around current regional challenges through various events at the Evans School.
Find out more about the background of the project.
Through a philanthropic gift from the Boeing Company, we were able to launch the Civic Engagement for the 21st Century Project at the Evans School in 2006.
The goal of the project is to create a new model of civic engagement that makes use of available forms of communication today.
A number of social and political forces in the world today inhibit our ability to find shared values and develop creative solutions to critical political problems. These forces include:
The research involved in designing the model will generate new knowledge about how to improve democratic governance through effective dialogues between citizens, policymakers, and stakeholders.
Citizens who want more knowledge and control over their future, and leaders who are seeking to better serve citizens and manage the political risks associated with change.
Find out more about the five core principles of civic engagement providing the foundation and scope for the project.
Distinguished Practitioner-in-Residence Norman B. Rice, a former City of Seattle mayor, is laying the foundation of the Civic Engagement for the 21st Century project. A number of major initiatives were in the Rice Administration were guided by five core principles of strong community engagement:
Framing questions around values first and issues second allows for building common ground and eases the divisiveness that is prevalent in today’s political environment.
Giving citizens the opportunity to shape the questions and answers requires compassionate leadership, trusting the process rather than controlling it, and not having presumptions about what the results of the process will be like.
A public endeavor will never fail from too much communication. Today’s technology has expanded the toolbox for communicating and can help move people along a continuum from being informed - to interested - to involved.
Communities need to identify and support leaders who:
Leaders must learn to leave boundaries and biases aside in order to get the heart of policy issues. This requires strategies at the regional level where silos of governance are brought down, working through territorial disputes, and prioritizing collaboration.
These same five core principles are used in all Civic Engagement for the 21st Century events hosted by the Evans School, which will put the project’s research to practice in discussing regional policy issues.
Find out more about Norman B. Rice and the foundation and scope of the project.
The focus of the Civic Engagement for the 21st Century project at the Evans School is not to advocate for particular perspectives. Rather, the focus is the advancement of meaningful, inclusive dialogue when addressing issues of public concern.
We will do this by studying effective components of civic engagement, including the new technologies of today, and the different roles each of us play in the process, including:
The work involved with the project will ultimately result in:
Find out more about our other key projects, grants, and awards.
Our commitment to advancing leaders in the public interest at the Evans School goes beyond the work of our research and outreach centers. Our faculty is among the top in the public policy and management fields when it comes to cutting-edge research and outreach. We make this work available to the public through key projects such as:
Find out more about the faculty and staff at the Evans School who makes these projects possible.
What are key ways to reduce poverty in communities? With funding from the Northwest Area Foundation, researchers from the Evans School are working to understand what policies are most effective in communities that vary by urban-rural location, in terms of racial and ethnic diversity, and with regard potential economic linkages with surrounding areas.
The five-year, $1.5 million Community Vitality Project will produce research papers that analyze the levers that both reduce poverty and enhance community vitality, with the goal of making recommendations for effective policies within the 8 states that the Northwest Area Foundation serves: Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, and Iowa.
Nonprofit Accountability Clubs seeks to better understand the phenomenon of voluntary regulation by nonprofits and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). The scale and scope of work done by these two entities has grown in recent years, resulting in increased governance challenges and the need for more oversight mechanisms.
This project, led by Mary Kay Gugerty, examines how voluntary oversight programs by nonprofits and NGOs can mitigate agency conflict, enhance the confidence of principals in nonprofits, and make reporting requirements less onerous. The research produced aims to answer:
Find out more about related nonprofit accountability research and Mary Kay Gugerty.
This research is a compilation of papers presented at various Nonprofit Accountability Clubs conferences.
Nonprofit Accountability Clubs: Voluntary Regulation of Nongovernmental and Nonprofit Organizations (377 KB PDF) by Mary Kay Gugerty and Aseem Prakash, Evans School of Public Affairs at the University of Washington
Benefits of Accreditation for Fundraising Nonprofits in the Netherlands (259 KB PDF)by René Bekkers, Utrecht University and Vrije Universitei Amsterdam, Netherlands
A History of Nonprofit Clubs in the United States (291 KB PDF) by Woods Bowman, DePaul University
The Emergence of Collective Accountability Standards in the Humanitarian Sector (390 KB PDF) by Maryam Zarnegar Deloffre, George Washington University
What Determines the Emergence and Structure of Clubs Among State Nonprofit Associations? (250 KB PDF) by Mary Tschirhart, Maxwell School of Syracuse University
Nonprofit Umbrella Associations as Reluctant Clubs (232 KB PDF) by Dennis R. Young, Georgia State University
The Impact of Sponsorship on Club Design (286 KB PDF) by Angela Bies, Texas A&M University
The Emergence of Nonprofit Clubs in Developing Countries (71 KB PDF) by Mary Kay Gugerty, Evans School of Public Affairs at the University of Washington
Does Self-Regulation Work? Some Evidence from Europe (63 KB PDF) Andreas Ortmann of Charles University Economics Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
Can Self-Regulatory Club Goods Serve Mission Accountability? (299 KB PDF) by Dana Brakman Reiser, Brooklyn Law School
Rethinking Advocacy Organizations Concept Paper (312 KB PDF) by Mary Kay Gugerty and Aseem Prakash, Evans School of Public Affairs at the University of Washington
Institutions, Culture and Advocacy Strategies: Comparing Climate Change and Biodiversity Advocacy in Japan, Germany and the United States (100 KB PDF) by Miranda Schreurs, Freie Universität Berlin
The Logic of Advocacy: Strategy and Competition among Organized Interests (92 KB PDF) by McGee Young, Marquette University
The Strategic Use of Branding by Advocacy Groups (88 KB PDF) by Maryann Barakso, American University
Structuring Global Advocacy: Explaining Organizational Change and the Emergence of Transnational Networks (132 KB PDF) by Hans Peter Schmitz, The Maxwell School at Syracuse University
The Market for Human Rights (112 KB PDF) by Clifford Bob, Duquesne University
Institutional Environment and the Organization of Advocacy NGOs in the OECD (112 KB PDF) by Elizabeth A. Bloodgood, Concordia University
Shaping Civic Advocacy: International and Domestic Policies towards Russia’s NGO Sector (92 KB PDF) by Sarah L. Henderson, Oregon State University
Religious Institutions as Transnational Actors: An Economic Approach (102 KB PDF) by Anthony Gill, University of Washington
Find out more about the Nonprofit Accountability Clubs.
With the Evans School Working Paper Series, you have access to our faculty’s research on relevant public policy and management issues prior to publication. All of the papers are available in PDF format and require Adobe Acrobat Reader to view.
While the papers are suitable for high-level scholarly and professional publications, they are still under the review process and may be subject to revision. Because of this, the papers should only be cited as Evans School Working Papers to preserve the integrity of the scholarly contribution and author’s copyright.
The Public Interest and State Policies Affecting Academic Research in California
By William Zumeta
Evans School Working Paper No. 2008-01 (1.5 MB PDF)
Re-visiting Socially-Optimal Vaccine Subsidies: An Empirical Application in Kolkata, India
By Joseph Cook, Marc Jeuland, Brian Maskery, Donald Lauria, Dipika Sur, John Clemens, and Dale Whittington
Evans School Working Paper No. 2008-02 (535 KB PDF)
The Cost-Effectiveness of Typhoid Vi Vaccination Programs: Calculations for Four Urban Sites in Four Asian Countries
By Joseph Cook, Marc Jeuland, Dale Whittington, Chirstin Poulous, John Clemens, Dipkia Sur, Dang Duc Anh, Magdarina Agtini, Zulfiqar Bhutta, and the Domie Typhoid Economics Study Group
Evans School Working Paper No. 2008-03 (500 KB PDF)
What Matters for Excellence in Ph.D. Programs? Latent Constructs of Doctoral Program Quality Used by Early Career Social Scientests
By William Zumeta
Evans School Working Paper No. 2008-04 (572 KB PDF)
The Moral Journey of Environmentalism: From Wilderness to Place
By Andrew Light
Evans School Working Paper No. 2007-07 (125 KB PDF)
Does a Public Environmental Philosophy Need a Convergence Hypothesis?
By Andrew Light
Evans School Working Paper No. 2007-06 (142 KB PDF)
Restorative Relationships: From Artifacts to Natural Systems
By Andrew Light
Evans School Working Paper No. 2007-05 (129 KB PDF)
Models of NGO Self-Regulation: Theory and Evidence from Africa
By Mary Kay Gugerty
Evans School Working Paper No. 2007-04 (62 KB PDF)
The School Finance Redesign Project: A Synthesis of Project Work to Date
By Paul T. Hill
Evans School Working Paper No. 2007-03 (345 KB PDF)
The effects of sexual orientation and marital status on how couples hold their money
By Marieka M. Klawitter
Evans School Working Paper No. 2007-02 (192 KB PDF)
Women's Access to Credit: Does it Matter for Household Efficiency?
By Diana Fletschner
Evans School Working Paper No. 2007-01 (122 KB PDF)
Banked or Unbanked? Individual and family access to savings and checking accounts
by Marieka Klawitter and Diana Fletschner
Evans School Working Paper No. 2006-16 (139 KB PDF)
Rural Women's Access to Credit: Market Imperfections and Intrahousehold Dynamics
by Diana Fletschner
Evans School Working Paper No. 2006-14 (124 KB PDF)
Constructing and Reconstructing Gender: Reference Group Effects and Women's Demand for Entrepreneurial Capital
by Diana Fletschner and Michael C. Carter
Evans School Working Paper No. 2006-13 (130 KB PDF)
Can Institutional Features of Hospitals Help Explain Nursing Shortages?
by Marsha G. Goldfarb, Robert S. Goldfarb, and Mark C. Long
Evans School Working Paper No. 2006-12 (312 KB PDF)
Intertemporal Choice and Development Policy: Cross Country Evidence on Time Inconsistent Discount Rates
by C. Leigh Anderson and Mary Kay Gugerty
Evans School Working Paper No. 2006-11 (188 KB PDF)
Outside Funding and the Dynamics of Participation in Community Associations
by Mary Kay Gugerty and Michael Kremer
Evans School Working Paper No. 2006-10 (292 KB PDF)
The Impact of Child Support Enforcement Policy on Nonmarital Childbearing
by Robert D. Plotnick, Irwin Garfinkel, Sara McLanahan, Inhoe Ku
Evans School Working Paper No. 2006-09 (81 KB PDF)
College Quality and Early Adult Outcomes
by Mark C. Long
Evans School Working Paper No. 2006-07 (215 KB PDF)
Secondary School Characteristics and Early Adult Outcomes
by Mark C. Long
Evans School Working Paper No. 2006-06 (285 KB PDF)
To Move or Not to Move: Relationships to Place and Relocation in HOPE VI
by Rachel Garshick Kleit and Lynne C. Manzo
Evans School Working Paper No. 2006-05 (375 KB PDF)
Bounded Rationality and Preference Variability Along the Policy Chain in Vietnam
by C. Leigh Anderson, Alison Cullen and Kostas Stamoulis
Evans School Working Paper No. 2006-04 (397 KB PDF)
Understanding the supply response of local public goods to environmental service payments
by C. Leigh Anderson
Evans School Working Paper No. 2006-03 (179 KB PDF)
The Effect of Environmental Sources of Crop Loss on Farmers' Willingness to Pay in Chiapas, Mexico
by C. Leigh Anderson, Leslie Lipper, Mauricio Bellon
Evans School Working Paper No. 2006-02 (300 KB PDF)
Network Management Strategies
by Joaquín Herranz, Jr.
Evans School Working Paper No. 2006-01 (359 KB PDF)
The Evans School's Electronic Hallway serves faculty who teach public administration, public policy, and related subjects through:
The policy areas of these cases include:
For more information visit The Electronic Hallway.
Public Service Clinics link the skills and services of second year Master of Public Administration (MPA) students with the real-world needs of nonprofit and public agencies. For more than a decade, our students have produced program evaluations, strategic plans, policy analyses, and new program designs.
During their last year of study, MPA students are required to complete a Degree Project, which demonstrates their mastery of analytic and organizational skills. By enrolling in the Public Service Clinics, students are able to choose from a variety of research topics proposed by local agencies, nonprofits, or students themselves.
The projects take two academic quarters to complete, and can be done in one of two formats led by experienced faculty:
Students and agencies are invited to learn more about the structure and timeline for Public Service Clinics and Degree Project Seminars by contacting the Public Service Clinics at psclinic@u.washington.edu or 206.221.3676.
Public Service Clinics and Degree Project Seminars are the same in that students work in seminar settings with the guidance of a faculty advisor and the support of peers through two six credit courses during their last year of study at the Evans School.
The only difference is that students in Public Service Clinics all work with agencies, while some students in Degree Project Seminars work with agencies and some work on topics independent of an agency. Both formats are organized around broad themes of public policy.
Autumn Quarter
Winter Quarter
Spring Quarter
Find out more about upcoming deadlines and events for the current academic year and how to submit a proposal by contacting the Public Service Clinics at psclinic@u.washington.edu or 206.221.3676.
October 6-7: Student Information Sessions
Second-year MPA students are invited to join Evans School faculty members and student services staff on October 6 and 7 for one of two presentations on degree project requirements and options for completing it independently or through a Public Service Clinic or Degree Project Seminar. Alumni will also be on hand to talk about their degree project experiences. Find out more »
October 15: Agency Topic Proposals Due
We are now soliciting proposals from public and nonprofit organizations for the 2008-09 academic year. Agencies are invited to submit a proposal, view past degree projects of outstanding merit, and learn more about the structure and timeline of the Clinics and Seminars.
For more information, contact the Public Service Clinics at psclinic@u.washington.edu or 206.221.3676.
The process for proposing a research topic is the same for both Public Service Clinics and Degree Project Seminars. Please note that Clinic and Seminar themes should be considered when preparing proposal topics.
Before filling out the form, we suggest you review our agency information and student information on writing a successful topic proposal. For more information, contact the Public Service Clinics at psclinic@u.washington.edu or 206.221.3676.
The Public Service Clinics at the Evans School is intended as a peer and faculty facilitated vehicle to connect the research, organizational change, and capacity building needs of community organizations and public agencies with graduate student degree projects. Each clinic and seminar is limited in size to ten students.
If you have more than one project you wish to submit, please complete a separate form for each project.
If a student is matched with your topic, you will need to meet with this student and clinic professor in December to develop a letter of agreement.
All fields followed by * are required.
If you want to participate in a clinic or seminar through the Public Service Clinics and have your own self-generated topic, please fill out this form. The Public Service Clinics' matching process works best when both the agency and the student understand and agree to the project's focus and goals. For this reason, we want to ensure that you and your agency contact have already met and thoroughly discussed and understand your topic.
Additionally, you must have discussed the $1250 participation fee with your agency and instruct them to contact psclinic@u.washington.edu indicating whether they will be paying the fee or requesting financial assistance before your proposal will be considered. Please contact us if you have any questions.
Please note that once you are accepted into the Public Service Clinics, you are required to meet with your clinic or seminar instructor and agency contact in December to develop a letter of agreement.
All fields followed by * are required.
The Public Service Clinics at the Evans School is intended as a peer and faculty facilitated vehicle to connect student degree project research with the research, organizational change, and capacity building needs of community organizations and public agencies. Participation is a powerful way to represent the Evans School and assist the community.
Each clinic and seminar is limited in size to ten students. Please submit a separate application for each of your top three choices.
Once accepted into the Public Service Clinics you are required to meet with your clinic or seminar instrucation and agency contact in December to develop a letter of agreement.
All fields followed by * are required.
The 2008-09 academic year offers three themed Public Service Clinics and three themed Degree Project Seminars led by faculty members with expertise and experience in their respective areas.
Public Service Clinic Themes
Degree Project Seminar Themes
There is student information and agency information available for developing research proposals by contacting the Public Service Clinics at psclinic@u.washington.edu or 206.221.3676.
This clinic looks at how we address poverty in a society that provides a very limited safety net by researching topics related to:
This clinic is led by Robert Plotnick and will relate to work being done by the West Coast Poverty Center. Plotnick, co-chair of the West Coast Poverty Center, is a social policy economist who has taught courses and written widely on American poverty, income inequality, and social welfare policy.
Find out more about available topics in this clinic and other